Discover the top 10 higher education giving days of 2026, the strategies that drove record results, and key trends shaping alumni fundraising this year.
Anwesha Kiran
Published:
May 26, 2026

Giving days are a concentrated burst of community energy that, when done right, move alumni, parents, students, and staff to act together. They’re also some of the most reliable vehicles to mobilize engagement from the community, year-on-year. But what "done right" looks like isn’t a fixed answer; it keeps evolving and looks different for different institutions.
We’ve put together a few examples of successful giving days that have stood out in 2026 so far. A few shattered institution records. Some took creative risks that paid off. All of them offer a glimpse into what higher education fundraising looks like right now, and what institutions are doing differently for 2026.
The general theme of giving can be described as cautiously optimistic. According to CASE's Insights on Voluntary Support of Education report released in April 2026, giving to U.S. higher education institutions exceeded $78 billion in FY 2025: a 4% year-over-year increase. This continued growth reflects donors' sustained confidence in colleges and universities.
These numbers also paint a more complex picture of the alumni donation landscape. The number of alumni donors shrank in number even as total giving went up, which means fewer donors are giving more. This places institutions in a position where engagement, and an effort to sustain and increase it year-on-year, becomes imperative.
Giving days are one of your best tools to address this directly: they widen the donor pool, cultivate first-time givers, and create visible momentum to signal institutional health.
Findings in CASE and Almabase’s State of Giving Days white paper also support this: nearly 40% of institutions said their giving day helped them engage more alumni and boost donor participation. More than one in four reported that these single-day campaigns contributed between 11% and 25% of their total annual fundraising.
The shift we’re seeing in 2026 is in how these institutions ensure that Giving Days work, through the strategies they’re adopting. Student generated content, more sophisticated and widely present gamification features, matching pools deployed with greater precision: these are some of the trends we’re seeing in 2026. And a handful of schools are even abandoning the standard 24-hour flash format entirely in favor of models better suited to their communities. The giving days below reflect all of that.
Theme: Boilermaker Heroes: Making Victories Possible
Purdue's Day of Giving (April 29) carved out a league of its own with a staggering $95.5 million from more than 34,000 individual gifts, making it one of the largest single-institution giving day results in higher education history, the second-highest gift count in Purdue's 13-year run with this event, trailing behind only last year's national-record-setting campaign.
They had different units (campus, college, school, program, club, or student organization) participate, with Purdue Engineering tracking roughly $12 million, while the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics pulled nearly $5.2 million, at least a little bit fueled by a patriotic thread tied to America's upcoming 250th anniversary. Purdue Athletics brought in a record $16.1 million through 2,569 gifts, surpassing its own prior record of $13 million set in 2024.
What worked: Purdue has refined its gamification model over more than a decade since its launch in 2014, and it shows. They used real-time leaderboards to put colleges, alumni clubs, and student organizations in direct competition for shares of matching pools. This worked very well for the event because it essentially turned passive donors into active participants who track outcomes and are fully involved in the process.

The hourly match challenges, such as Best Photo Challenge, Best Selfie Challenge, Boilermaker Kids challenge, and the much-loved Purdue Pets Challenge, all of which included posting pictures with their hashtags ‘#PurdueConvos’ and ‘#PurdueDayofGiving’ spread word on social media to a degree that would cost far more to replicate through paid channels.
The campaign also tracked geographic state participation, giving the team a nationwide Boilermaker Pride narrative that resonated beyond campus.

The ‘social feeds’ tab on their Giving Page also documented the student and community generated content along with their campaign hashtags. They also provided a social media toolkit, complete with ready-to-use posts and images, making it much easier for supporters to show up meaningfully.

The deeper lesson here is that consistency is the gift that keeps on giving. The institution consistently repeats strategies that work for their giving days while also taking new initiatives, keeping the experience modern and fresh for attendees. Purdue's cumulative giving day total since 2014 has now crossed $697 million. That kind of institutional momentum is itself a fundraising asset.
Theme: Nature-Themed Basecamp Exploration

Cornell's giving day 2026 campaign used a custom arcade mini-game in which users avoided obstacles and collected “digital apples” on a virtual campus map. Collecting apples within the campus map gave donors an experience that felt native to the institution and introduced a layer of delight, nostalgia and interactivity that most donors hadn't seen before.
More importantly, that mechanic was tied directly to dollars: top-performing departments unlocked portions of a $2.4 million matching fund pool based on participation. The result was over 17,000 individual donors and more than 25,000 total gifts.
The institution had organised as many as 13 different events to make the Giving Day an immersive, rewarding experience for students. They could write thank-you postcards to donors, enjoy snacks, participate in giveaways and so much more.

They also leveraged peer-to-peer giving, with 704 Giving Day champions securing more than 4,037 gifts, which was record-shattering.
What worked: Cornell mixed and matched a few strategies that worked out best for them. The mini arcade game gave donors a reason to stay engaged beyond the moment of their gift. To this they tied in matching fund unlocks, essentially doubling the impact made. Finally, they also had students write thank you notes to donors, showing moments of gratitude in real time. The nature-themed "basecamp" framing also gave the campaign a cohesive visual identity that made it memorable for attendees and shareable across social channels.
Theme: Ole Miss Giving Day
Ole Miss has had a unique approach of baking institutional history into their annual giving day, which takes place every spring. This year too, the campaign window was set at exactly 1 day, 8 hours, and 48 minutes, as a callback to the university's 1848 founding year. It's a small detail, but one that declares intentionality to donors and attendees.
A leaderboard was adopted to track the number of donors from each department in real time, to increase competition among donors. They also live streamed the event for the duration it was active.
Along with this, they also added a physical element. A "Squirrel Scavenger Hunt" was designed to send participants across campus searching for hidden stuffed squirrels, with each discovery unlocking $250 in matching funds directed to the finder's chosen fund.
Donors could also "name a squirrel" for a $26 gift or sign the historic Ventress Hall turret, turning philanthropy into something tactile and campus-rooted.

Department leaderboards and live-streamed updates from university leaders kept the digital momentum going in parallel.
What worked: The Ole Miss team understood that a giving day is fundamentally a community event. The squirrel activation gave students and staff something to do and share, creating word-of-mouth momentum that is hard to replicate through any other channel. Tying the campaign window to the university's founding year added an element of storytelling that is distinctive to the institution’s identity.
Theme: Mason Now: Power the Possible
George Mason's 2026 giving day stood out for a metric that rarely makes the headline: approximately 25% of its donors were giving for the first time! That's a significant new-donor conversion rate for any institution, and it signals that the campaign successfully reached beyond its existing base.
The strategy here was to closely tie this giving day to a larger multi-year campaign. By positioning the giving day as a visible milestone within that broader arc of their Mason Now campaign, GMU gave both existing donors and first-timers a clear sense of the mission and their place in the outcome.

What worked: GMU approached their giving day as a donor acquisition vehicle rather than purely a revenue event. This influenced messaging, targeting, and put the event in perspective for everyone involved. The 25% first-time donor rate suggests the team invested in prospecting and outreach instead of a single-day fundraiser, which makes a lot of sense in context.
Theme: Make It Count for Meredith
Meredith College's giving day ran in parallel with the institution's 135th birthday; a decision that unlocked a layer of storytelling the campaign used well. The Greatest Needs Fund, which allows the college to allocate funds to areas that need it the most, secured $454,672 on its own, reflecting strong donor trust in institutional decision-making.

The most distinctive element, however, was the spread in geographic activation: 11 regional watch parties ran simultaneously across North Carolina and Washington, D.C., bringing the giving day to those who couldn't be on campus. The board of trustees, parents, and alumni groups funded 15 matching gift challenges totaling $460,000, and an "Odds vs. Evens" class-year competition ran throughout the day.
What worked: For a women's college with a deeply relational alumnae community, distributed in-person events turned a digital campaign into a series of local moments. The giving day became a reason to gather : which made giving feel like an act of belonging, not just philanthropy. The birthday framing gave first-time donors a natural reason to act: celebrating a milestone feels different from responding to a need.
Theme: UCA Ready to Grow
UCA's March 13 sprint deliberately moved away from broad-message capital campaign marketing toward hyperspecific, fund-level storytelling. Rather than deploying universal matching pools, the team created tailored mini-milestones for individual initiatives: a new Aviation Academy pilot training module, an Athletics Championship Resource sub-pool, and specific tracks for Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences.

This meant donors weren't giving to the larger "UCA", they were funding a specific program they could see and name.
What worked: Segmented, cause-specific fundraising isn't new, but it was used as the one specific strategy by UCA. By making each fund feel like a distinct campaign within the larger day, they reduced donor fatigue and increased the sense of direct impact. Donors who care about education gave to education. Donors who care about aviation gave to aviation. The $1.2M result across more than 3,100 donors reflects both breadth across different causes and genuine engagement.
Theme: Going Above and Beyond for Students

Creighton's giving day took a grassroots-first approach, centering community voting as the mechanism through which challenge dollars were awarded. Student-led coalitions : including the Street Medicine program, which provides direct healthcare to underserved populations in Omaha : competed for popular vote tallies, with winning coalitions receiving earmarked challenge grants. The top voted club earned a $2000 gift.
Additionally, there were stickers and socks given out to donors, and the campus therapy dog, Ella, was present in the event for a short duration, adding to the delight factor.

What worked: Incorporating voting into the event gives non-donors a reason to participate in the campaign, creating a layer of supporters who become familiar with individual programs before they give. It also adds a layer of credibility from the voters’ perspective. With the freebies, the socks, coffee, snacks and the free hugs, it is clear that Creighton's $1.11M result from nearly 3,000 donors reflects how participatory design expands reach and impact by considering the experience offered to the attendees.
Theme: The Power of Opportunity
St. John's ran one of the more creative low-barrier engagement strategies on this list: small-dollar gift thresholds unlocked on-campus experiential perks. A $10 gift gave donors access to an on-campus food truck dessert ticket; $20 unlocked a full lunch voucher. The campaign was centered on low-income financial aid and the university's Vincentian community mission.

What worked: By pairing small gifts with immediate, physical rewards, St. John's reduced the psychological friction of giving, especially younger alumni who may not have deep giving habits yet. The approach is replicable, and the results suggest it worked.
Theme: Bridge to the Future
Queens' Giving Day runs as a 36-hour online fundraising drive which is already a departure from the standard 24-hour format most institutions use. The 2026 campaign closed with 588 donations and £650,778 raised.

Donor-count challenges were front and center in the campaign: hitting 400 donors unlocked £4,000, and reaching 500 unlocked a further £5,000. Because these were participation thresholds a donor who gives £10 counts the same as one who gives £1,000 toward unlocking those challenges. This framing lowered the barrier to entry and gave smaller donors a reason to act. A final-hour challenge sweetened the close: raise £25,000 in the last 60 minutes, unlock another £25,000. Both mechanics were fully unlocked by the end of the day.
A matriculation decade leaderboard ran throughout, ranking donor participation by the era alumni graduated; the 1970s cohort led with 106 donors, followed by the 1980s at 94. It's a simple touch, but it works: class-year competition creates identity-driven motivation.
What worked: The 36-hour window gives the campaign breathing room for alumni across time zones to participate without the pressure of a midnight cutoff. Paired with a "give early" feature that let donors contribute before the official window opened, Queens' essentially extended the campaign in both directions without diluting the urgency of the final-hour challenge.
This strategy paired with proven ones like a matriculation leaderboard, the choice of funds given to donors and the donor-count challenges, added to lowering the barrier for participation even further. This campaign was engineered to give itself the best shot.
The result is a campaign that felt inclusive globally but still had a hard close that drove action.
Theme: OneGW
GW's 2026 Giving Day ran for just over 24 hours on April 7 and 8 and raising more than $2 million from over 3,800 donors: the largest in the university's history, surpassing a 2025 campaign that had itself set a then-record. Back-to-back records in consecutive years is a sign that they’re doing several things right!

The campaign covered every corner of the university: scholarships, student organizations, athletics, academic programs, and research, and drew support from all 50 states and even overseas, with the farthest gift coming from Singapore. That geographic spread tells you the campaign is tapping into an alumni network that's genuinely engaged, not just locally loyal.
The "OneGW" framing ran throughout the day, with challenge mechanics and peer storytelling as the primary engagement levers. GW has positioned Giving Day as a signature university tradition since its 2021 launch which means donors now come into the campaign with some familiarity and expectation, and the institution matches those expectations through consistency.
What worked: With five years in the game, each year's record becomes the baseline expectation for the next, and GW has proved that this pressure leads to sharpened execution. The geographic reach suggests the team has gotten better at outreach beyond the DC metro area. And the "OneGW" identity, spanning Foggy Bottom and the health system campus, gives the campaign breadth without losing cohesion. The consecutive record years are the clearest signal that GW has figured out the basics and is now building on top of a solid foundation.
Several threads run across this year's standout campaigns.
UCA and Creighton are the clearest examples, but it's visible across the institutions on this list, one way or the other: donors respond to named programs instead of simple department name drops. "Fund the Aviation Academy" seems to generally perform better than "Support UCA's Growth."
Ole Miss's squirrel hunt, Meredith's regional watch parties, and St. John's food truck perks demonstrate that the most engaging giving days create something to do offline that can be shared online. These are the trade-offs being made in place of the more traditional donation link. It may be more effort intensive but the effort pays off.
George Mason's 25% first-time donor rate won't be the last we hear of this kind of tracking. As CASE's latest data shows, institutions are navigating a narrowing high-capacity donor base, which makes these entry points more valuable.
Meredith's regional watch parties, Ole Miss's campus squirrel hunt, St. John's food truck perks: all of these activities would feel forced at a different institution or a different community. The schools that did the most interesting work in 2026 designed for their own communities, which goes to show how well they know who shows up for them. When the experience itself is worth showing up for, the giving follows.
If you're looking at these results and thinking about what your institution's next giving day could look like, we’ve got some great free resources to help you get started!
The 2026 giving day season isn't over, so we will be seeing more great examples of giving days in the coming months. But even this early snapshot tells us something about the direction of higher education fundraising.
Giving days are getting more intentional and community oriented. The institutions that understand their communities deeply enough to design a day that feels specific, meaningful, and worth showing up for will be the ones driving the best results.
If you are looking for the perfect partner to help you bring success to your next giving day, feel free to book a personalized demo and we’d love to talk!
Table of Contents
Subscribe
See how modern advancement teams bring alumni engagement and fundraising together.
Spring fundraiser ideas are campaigns and events that institutions run between March and June to raise money, grow donor participation, and bring their community closer together. Spring is one of the strongest fundraising windows of the year, and the reasons go beyond good weather.
Some of the best spring fundraiser ideas include:
In this guide, we’ll break down 25+ proven ideas across different formats and audiences. The goal is to help you identify ideas that align with your campaign goals and translate into measurable participation and fundraising outcomes.
Before we get into the details of each idea, it helps to understand why spring works so well for fundraising in the first place.
Spring is the perfect time for fundraising campaigns because donors are more willing to give, the institutional calendar is full of engagement moments, and the weather makes it possible to run event formats that other seasons cannot support.
Donors show up differently in spring. They are more social, more optimistic, and many have just received tax refunds. That is a hard mix to find at other times of the year. And because spring also lines up with graduation, reunions, homecoming, and end-of-year giving pushes, the ask lands when people already feel connected to your institution.
The weather plays a role, too. Outdoor events, hybrid formats, and in-person gatherings are all easier to pull off. That means your team can reach donors through real experiences instead of relying on emails and social posts to do all the heavy lifting.
The data backs this up. According to the 2024 CASE Insights Alumni Engagement Survey, 51.8% of institutions reported increased alumni engagement. A lot of that growth is tied to seasonal programming that gives people a concrete reason to show up and participate.
This is also why many advancement teams are starting to build spring into their annual giving strategy as a dedicated campaign window. When engagement is already high, pairing it with the right giving tools and campaign infrastructure can turn participation into actual donor growth. Almabase’s ‘planning a giving day’ ebook offers a guided explanation to plan a successful giving day and is a good place to get started with a spring fundraiser.
When it comes to planning, most teams start with a basic question: What format works for us? Can we do something outdoors? Should it be virtual? How much budget do we actually have?
Here are spring fundraiser ideas grouped by format to help you figure out what fits.
Outdoor fundraisers are some of the most popular spring fundraising event ideas because the weather finally lets you bring people together in person. And when people show up, they tend to give more.
Here are a few that work well outdoors:
The most important thing with outdoor fundraisers is making sure donations do not depend entirely on who shows up. If you pair your event with an online giving page, you can collect gifts before, during, and after the event. A registration-to-donation flow helps here. The person who signs up is already interested enough to give.
Cloud County Community College did this well. Their annual scholarship auction raised $67,000 and drove 3X click rates on alumni emails because event promotion and the giving ask were connected from the start. If you want to see how event and fundraising workflows can work together, the Almabase events platform is a good reference.
Virtual fundraisers take the venue and the weather out of the picture entirely. They cost less to run, they are easier to scale, and they often reach donors who would never show up to an in-person event.
Here are a few virtual spring fundraising ideas worth looking at:
With virtual fundraisers, the donor experience on the other end decides how well the campaign performs. If someone taps a link on their phone and the giving page takes too long to load or feels clunky, you lose them. The checkout needs to be quick, work well on mobile, and feel the same on every device. Teams using Almabase run their virtual campaigns by giving pages built around this kind of fast, clean checkout experience.
The other piece that matters is social sharing. When a donor can share their gift with one tap and tag someone else to give, the campaign starts reaching people your team would never have contacted on its own.
Not every spring fundraiser needs a big budget or a large team. Some of the most effective ideas are simple ones that can go from idea to launch in a few days.
Here are a few low-cost spring fundraiser ideas that are easy to get off the ground:
These ideas are a good fit for small teams with limited budgets who need to get something going quickly. The main challenge is that even simple campaigns create manual work when your team is handling receipts, tracking gifts, and following up with donors by hand.
Automating those steps changes the math. When gift receipts, thank-you emails, and donor tracking happen on their own, your team spends less time on admin and more time running the actual campaign. The Almabase eBook on eliminating inefficiencies goes deeper into how fragmented tools create extra work and what it looks like when you bring everything into one place.
Format is one way to choose a spring fundraiser. But the right idea also depends on who you are trying to reach, which is what we will cover next.
The best spring fundraiser idea for your team depends on who you are trying to reach. Schools do well with campaigns that get students and parents involved together. Colleges and alumni programs need campaigns that work across geographies and class years. Nonprofits lean on mission-driven storytelling. Sports teams and clubs benefit from the shared identity their members already have.
Here is how spring fundraiser ideas break down by audience.
Schools have a built-in advantage when it comes to spring fundraising. Parents are already involved, students are easy to rally around a shared goal, and the school calendar gives you natural moments to build a campaign around.
Here are a few that tend to do well:
School fundraisers work in the spring because students and parents are both engaged at the same time. When both groups are active, participation tends to take care of itself. Adding gamification, like progress bars and class rankings, gives people something to track and talk about.
Archbishop Riordan High School saw this play out at scale. After switching to a mobile-friendly giving experience with real-time campaign tracking, their giving day donations grew by 550%, going from $60,646 in 2017 to $338,724 in 2018. A big part of that was social giving, 20% of gifts were influenced by donors sharing their contribution and encouraging others to do the same. For more school fundraising ideas, this Almabase guide goes deeper into what works.
Spring fundraising for colleges and alumni programs looks different from school-level campaigns. Your donors are spread across geographies, they graduated at different times, and their connection to the institution varies. The campaigns that work here are the ones that make giving feel personal and tied to something specific.
A few ideas that fit this audience well:
The execution side matters a lot with alumni campaigns. Segmenting your audience by class year, location, or past giving behavior helps you send the right message to the right group. And peer-to-peer fundraising pages give your most engaged alumni a way to bring others in without your team having to do all the outreach.
Boyd-Buchanan School is a good example. Their first giving day on Almabase surpassed its goal by 201%. What made it work was that 60% of alumni signed up on the platform before the campaign even launched, and engaged users grew 5X within five months. When alumni are already active, the giving day becomes a moment to convert that activity into actual gifts. The Almabase annual fund page covers how this works in practice, and the State of Giving Days report has benchmarks from over 150 institutions.
Nonprofit fundraising in spring is less about institutional calendar moments and more about mission. Your donors give because they believe in what you do, so the campaigns that work best are the ones that make that connection feel real.
Ideas that tend to land well for nonprofits:
Storytelling is what ties all of these together. Donors want to see the impact of their gift, so building your campaign around a specific story or outcome makes the ask stronger. Reaching donors across more than one channel helps too. Running your campaign across email, text, and social at the same time gives you more chances to land the message. The Almabase multi-channel bundle is built around this idea, helping teams run coordinated outreach without managing each channel separately.
Sports teams and clubs have something most other groups do not: a strong shared identity. Members already see themselves as part of a team, which makes fundraising feel less like an ask and more like a group effort.
Ideas that work well for this audience:
Peer-to-peer fundraising is the strongest tool here. When each team member has a personal page and shares it with their own network, the campaign reaches far beyond the team itself. The competitive nature of sports also helps. Leaderboards showing which player or group has raised the most tend to push people to do more. Teams running campaigns through Almabase can set up these personal pages and leaderboards within the same system they use for tracking gifts and donor activity.
Choosing the right idea is one part of it. The next step is figuring out how to pick the best option for your specific goals and audience.
Picking a spring fundraiser idea is easier when you start with two questions: what are we trying to achieve, and who are we trying to reach?
Before picking an idea, get clear on what success looks like for this campaign.
The right idea also depends on who you are reaching and when they are most available.
Once you have the right idea picked out, the next step is making sure your campaign is set up to perform.
A high-performing spring fundraising campaign comes down to four things: a giving page that makes it easy to donate, a peer-to-peer structure that spreads the campaign beyond your team's reach, promotion across more than one channel, and tracking that shows you what is working while the campaign is still running.
Let's break down each of those.
Your giving page is where the campaign either converts or loses people. If it loads slowly, looks generic, or asks for too many steps before someone can complete a gift, donors will drop off.
A few things that make a real difference:
Almabase's giving platform is built around this kind of setup. Branded pages, fast mobile checkout, flexible gift types, and clean CRM syncing so advancement teams can focus on running the campaign instead of fixing data after it ends.
Your team can only reach so many people directly. Peer-to-peer fundraising solves that by turning your most engaged supporters into campaign ambassadors.
What that looks like in practice:
The numbers back this up. St. Ignatius College Preparatory saw an 80% increase in giving day donations by leaning into social giving, peer-to-peer fundraising, and personalized outreach. When donors can see others giving and share their own gift easily, the campaign builds momentum that your team could not create through direct outreach alone.
Email alone is not enough as most emails go unread. The ones that do get opened are generally competing with dozens of other messages in the inbox.
The campaigns that perform best use more than one channel to get the message across:
Teams using email, text, and video together through the platform have seen 3X the impact compared to running email-only campaigns.
Once your campaign is live, you need to see how it is doing while it is still running. Waiting until the campaign ends to look at the numbers means you have already missed chances to adjust.
What to keep an eye on:
Almabase gives advancement teams real-time reporting across engagement, events, and donations within the same platform. That means your team can track performance and act on it without pulling data from separate tools into a spreadsheet.
With the right idea, the right audience, and the right campaign setup in place, the last step is putting it all together.
Spring gives you a window where donors are more open, the calendar is on your side, and the format options are wide. The ideas are the starting point. The results come from picking the right campaign for your goals, reaching the right audience, and having the tools to execute it cleanly.
Whether you are running a giving day for alumni, a walkathon for parents, or a peer-to-peer challenge for students, what matters most is how easy you make it for people to give and how well you track what happens after they do.
If you want to see how that comes together in one system, book a demo with Almabase to see how it would fit your setup.
Giving days with matching gifts, auction events, and crowdfunding campaigns tend to bring in the most revenue. These formats create urgency and attract larger gifts, especially when paired with a clear goal and a deadline.
Read-a-thons, bake sales, classroom competitions, and dress-down days are easy to set up and run. They need minimal budget, get students and parents involved quickly, and can go from idea to launch in a few days.
Start by setting a clear goal, whether that is participation, revenue, or donor acquisition. Then pick a format that fits your audience and budget. Set up a branded giving page, plan your promotion across multiple channels, and build in tracking from day one.
Virtual 5Ks, online auctions, digital giving days, and livestream fundraising events all work well as virtual spring fundraisers. They cost less to run, scale easily, and reach donors who would not attend an in-person event.
Use peer-to-peer fundraising so your supporters spread the campaign through their own networks. Add leaderboards and challenges to create friendly competition. Promote across email, text, and social instead of relying on one channel alone.
Look for a platform that covers giving pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, event management, multi-channel promotion, and real-time reporting in one place. CRM integration matters too so gift data stays accurate without manual entry.

25+ Spring Fundraiser Ideas That Actually Work in 2026
Explore 25+ spring fundraiser ideas for schools, colleges, nonprofits, and clubs. Includes ideas by format, audience, execution tips, and campaign tools.
Fundraising
Do you remember the first time you volunteered? I do.
It was for an NGO where I volunteered to teach kids at a school that was running low on staff. I remember walking into that classroom for the very first time, taking my first-ever class, and feeling a sense of connection I had never felt before. It genuinely felt like I had made a difference. And as I continued over the years, giving back to that organization financially became the easiest decision I ever made. Not because anyone asked me the right way, but because I had seen the work firsthand. I believed in it. I was part of it.
Through that experience, I also built something I hadn't expected: lasting friendships and a network of people who were equally passionate about making a difference. When that organization makes an ask today, I don't think twice.
That's a personal story. But when you extrapolate it, volunteering is a life-changing experience for many. No matter the form it takes. From participating in a small fundraiser to serving on an advisory committee, volunteering quietly paves the way to some of your most loyal and generous donors.And most institutions are leaving this pathway almost entirely untapped.
This isn't based on feeling alone. The 2026 National Alumni Survey, led by Howard Heevner and Sarah Kleeberger and co-sponsored by Almabase, surveyed over 82,000 alumni across 31 colleges and universities. The findings on volunteering are striking.
Alumni who recently volunteered with their alma mater are, simply put, a different category of donor.

The connection isn't coincidental. Volunteering builds the exact conditions that make giving feel natural: emotional investment, awareness of impact, and a sense of belonging. Alumni who volunteer don't give because they're asked well. They give because they care deeply, and they care deeply because they showed up first.
💡RISD’s “Life after RISD” initiative, for example, created flexible ways for alumni to mentor students, participate in career conversations, and support networking communities. [Learn More]
The honest answer is that most volunteer programs were designed for a different era. Traditional offerings like alumni events, leadership committees, and reunion committees were built around older models of engagement that assumed alumni had the time, proximity, and interest to commit to open-ended roles.
Today's alumni, particularly younger ones, don't see themselves in those formats. They want flexibility. They want to contribute a skill, not fill a seat. And critically, they want to see the impact of what they do. Not months later in an annual report, but in a way that feels immediate and personal.
When those conditions aren't met, volunteering quietly falls off the list. And with it, so does the pathway to giving.
The shift doesn't require a program overhaul. It requires rethinking what "volunteering" means and who it's designed for. Here's where to start:
Short, virtual, time-bound engagements like a one-hour career conversation, a Giving Day ambassador role, or a single mentoring session lower the barrier dramatically for younger alumni and first-time volunteers who aren't ready to commit to standing roles.
💡Pacific Northwest University, featured in CASE Insights on Giving Day 2026, expanded Giving Day participation beyond donations by introducing opportunities like mentorship, admissions support, and preceptor roles, reinforcing the idea that engagement often comes before giving [Read More]
Career advising, project-based consulting, and issue-focused advocacy align closely with how many alumni want to contribute today. Findings from the 2026 National Alumni Survey suggest that alumni interests vary across communities and lived experiences, with some gravitating toward career-focused engagement and others toward service-oriented involvement. Offering multiple pathways allows institutions to meet alumni where they are.
After every volunteer interaction, close the loop. Share what happened as a result. Connect their contribution to a student outcome, a program milestone, or a real story. Volunteers who see their impact are far more likely to return and to give.
Once an alumnus has volunteered and seen the work, the transition to giving should feel like a natural next step, not a separate ask. Design the journey intentionally, from first engagement to first gift.
💡Institutions like Concordia College have focused on creating more continuous and accessible alumni engagement experiences through digital communities, events, and ongoing participation opportunities. The result is a stronger sense of connection over time, where fundraising becomes part of an existing relationship rather than a one-time campaign ask. [Read more]
Timely, personalized acknowledgment matters more than formal recognition programs. Peer shoutouts, digital acknowledgment tied to specific impact, and authentic storytelling go further than plaques and event mentions.
The 2026 National Alumni Survey makes one thing clear: alumni haven't disengaged from generosity. They've simply redirected it toward causes and organizations that make them feel connected, informed, and like they genuinely matter.
Volunteering is the fastest, most human way to create that feeling.
Your best future donors may not be donors yet. But there's a good chance they're willing to show up, if you give them the right reason to.
👉 Explore the full 2026 National Alumni Survey findings on how volunteering shapes donor behavior.

How Alumni Volunteers Become Donors
Learn how alumni volunteering drives alumni giving, strengthens engagement, and builds long-term donor relationships according to the 2026 National Alumni Survey.
Fundraising
I fall right between Gen Z and Millennials, a Zillennial, if you want to get specific.
I'm not starting my day with matcha every morning, but I appreciate the vibe. Memes are definitely a love language, but so is a well-organized Excel sheet.
Writing this piece felt oddly personal. Because I am both generations at once.
So when the data on alumni giving from younger graduates landed in front of me, I didn't just analyze it. I recognized myself in it.
Here's what the numbers actually say, and what university fundraising teams need to hear.
The short answer to why Millennials and Gen Z aren't giving to their alma mater: they are giving. Just not to you.
And before you take that personally, it's worth understanding why.
The 2026 National Alumni Survey, gathered from over 82,000 alumni voices across 31 colleges and universities, makes the picture clear:
That's a signal right there.

When Millennials and Gen Z give, they give to causes that feel immediate, personal, and visible.
Here's what that looks like in practice:

The pattern is clear: younger alumni gravitate toward giving that feels direct. They want to see a face, a story, a specific person whose life changed because of their contribution. Broad, abstract institutional appeals simply don't compete with that.
This isn't a generational quirk. It's a logical response to how younger alumni experience the world and institutions.
Let's break it down:
1. They need to see visible impact.Younger alumni don't give out of tradition or obligation. They give when they can connect their contribution to a real, tangible outcome, like a scholarship that put a first-generation student through graduation or an emergency fund that kept someone from dropping out. When the impact is invisible, so is the motivation to give.
💡For example, the University of North Carolina School of the Arts moved from a “one day, one fund” model to offering over 40 donor-choice funds during Giving Day. [Read More]
2. They prefer immediacy over schedules.Nearly one in three younger alumni give on an "as needed" basis, responding when a cause needs support right now. Only 17% give on a regular schedule, compared to 38% of older alumni. Annual fund cycles and fiscal year deadlines don't map to how this generation thinks about generosity.
3. Institutional trust isn't automatic.Older giving models assumed loyalty. Younger alumni don't start from a place of institutional trust. They extend it based on evidence, transparency, and whether they feel genuinely seen. According to the 2026 National Alumni Survey, 40% of alumni feel disconnected from their institution, and nearly half feel ill-informed about what it's doing. That's not a foundation for giving.
🔥In our recent webinar with Dr Amanda Shoemaker, we unpack what drives young alumni to give. [Watch here]
4. They expect frictionless, digital-first giving.43% of younger alumni give via digital wallets like Apple Pay or Venmo, compared to just 14% of older graduates. If your giving process has friction, you've already lost them.
Here's what you need to know: most advancement teams are still running playbooks written for a different generation of donors.
Annual fund appeals, broad unrestricted messaging, and campaigns built around institutional pride may work for older alumni but they land flat with younger ones. Generic outreach doesn't answer the question younger alumni are silently asking:
"What does this have to do with me, and what will actually change because of my gift?"
Impact storytelling is often delayed, buried in newsletters, or framed around the institution rather than the people it serves. That's the opposite of what works.
The good news is that the data doesn't just diagnose the problem. It points clearly toward what moves younger alumni.
1. Lead with cause-based campaigns.Replace broad annual fund appeals with specific, values-driven opportunities like student emergency funds, mental health services, first-generation initiatives, and campus food pantries. These are the areas where younger alumni see themselves and their values reflected.
Here's what the data shows about which funding areas resonate most by age group:

The gap on mental health services, first-gen initiatives, and emergency funds is especially telling. These are causes younger alumni care about deeply, often from personal experience, and they are chronically underpromoted in most alumni giving campaigns.
2. Tell real stories about real people.The shift toward GoFundMe-style giving is a signal, not a trend to dismiss. Younger alumni want to know who they are helping. Put a name, a face, and a specific situation at the center of your ask. The institution is the vehicle. The person is the story.
💡Alumni Association of the School of Medicine of Loma Linda University saw success by tying campaigns to real outcomes and beneficiaries, helping donors understand not just what they’re giving to, but who they’re helping. [Learn more]
3. Make online giving frictionless.Offer digital wallet options and mobile-first experiences that simplify online giving. Create time-bound, shareable campaigns like Giving Days that feel communal and immediate. Younger alumni are more likely to give in the moment than on a schedule, so meet them where they are.
4. Acknowledge debt without making it awkward.Student loan debt is a real factor for younger alumni, particularly alumni of color and women. But here's what the survey found: 77% of those burdened by debt still give to other organizations. The barrier isn't financial capacity. It's relevance and trust. Acknowledge competing financial pressures in your messaging without pressure or apology, and focus the ask on collective impact rather than individual sacrifice.
💡Is Your Higher Ed Website Meeting Gen Z’s Expectations? Audit your higher ed website with this self-assessment.
The 2026 National Alumni Survey puts it plainly: younger alumni haven't disengaged from generosity. They're selective about where it goes, and they're directing it toward causes and organizations that earn their trust, show their impact, and respect their agency.
Higher education hasn't lost their goodwill. It just hasn't earned their giving yet.
The gap is closeable. But it closes through relevance, transparency, and real human connection.
👉 Curious about what motivates alumni giving across institutions? Explore the full 2026 National Alumni Survey findings to see how your institution compares.

Why Millennials and Gen Z Aren't Giving to Their Alma Mater (And What Actually Works)
Why Millennials and Gen Z aren’t giving to their alma mater and what actually works. Insights from the 2026 National Alumni Survey on how younger alumni give differently.
Alumni Engagement