Compare the best alumni management software for engagement, events, mentoring, and fundraising. See how Almabase stacks up against top platforms.
Almabase
Published:
April 20, 2026

Discover AI Summary
• Make sure your alumni engagement and fundraising efforts aren't siloed: The biggest takeaway is that disconnected systems often create more work and lead to lower participation, so look for a platform that brings events, giving, and communication into one smooth workflow.
• Prioritize seamless CRM data integration to get a true picture of alumni involvement: Manually updating records is a time drain, so choose a platform that automatically syncs engagement and giving activity with your CRM, like Blackbaud or Salesforce, giving you consistent, real-time insights.
• Identify your institution's core engagement goals to pick the right platform: Different tools excel at specific areas, whether it's building a strong career mentorship program, fostering a vibrant online community, or offering a comprehensive suite for all your engagement and fundraising needs.
• Boost consistent alumni engagement by making participation visible and connected to your efforts: The article highlights that platforms showing peer activity and linking community interaction to events and fundraising tend to keep alumni more actively involved over time.
• Dive into detailed comparisons of leading alumni management software to find your best fit: The post provides a helpful breakdown of how platforms like Almabase, Graduway, PeopleGrove, and Hivebrite stack up across key features and use cases.
Most institutions evaluating alumni management software already have a CRM or an alumni database in place. What often changes over time is how difficult it becomes to run engagement programs consistently using those systems.
Teams often start seeing a gradual change in day-to-day execution where participation drops after initial campaigns, follow-ups take up more working hours and the data to tie it all together sits across multiple systems, eventually slowing down outreach and reporting. This is where the initial (or in some cases additional) platform choice starts to matter.
Today, we have a blog that compares four platforms that institutions commonly evaluate, including Almabase, Graduway, PeopleGrove, and Hivebrite. We’ll walk you through how each one works in practice and what to consider when shortlisting the right option.
Alumni management software helps institutions manage alumni relationships across programs such as events, communication, and fundraising within a single system. It allows teams to track participation and connect engagement activity with giving, which reduces manual effort when data needs to be shared across departments.
Selecting the right platform depends on how well it supports your institution’s programs in practice. To begin, let’s compare the four mentioned platforms that institutions that we’ve picked out:
And a quick summary before we proceed with the detailed comparisons:
The next section looks at how these platforms compare across specific institutional needs.
For advancement teams, engagement and fundraising are deeply connected. Events drive participation. Participation drives giving. Giving drives long-term alumni relationships.
The right alumni management software should support that entire cycle without forcing teams to stitch together multiple disconnected tools.
Here’s how Almabase and Graduway compare when the priority is advancement-led engagement and fundraising.
Almabase connects directly with systems such as Blackbaud, Salesforce, and Ellucian, which means engagement and giving activity flows back into the institution’s CRM as it happens. This reduces the need for manual updates and allows advancement teams to work with a consistent view of alumni participation and donor activity.
Graduway stores alumni data within its platform and links fundraising through the Gravyty ecosystem. The level of CRM synchronization depends on how those integrations are configured, which can affect how easily teams track activity across systems.
Almabase supports event execution with built-in workflows that carry through from registration to post-event tracking. Because participation data is tied to fundraising activity, teams can see how events contribute to broader advancement outcomes without additional reconciliation.
Graduway supports event coordination and communication within the platform, with a primary focus on facilitating alumni participation. When teams need deeper visibility into how events influence fundraising, they often rely on additional tools within the Gravyty setup.
Almabase includes giving workflows within the same system used for engagement. Campaigns, donations, and participation data remain connected, which helps teams track outcomes without switching between tools.
Graduway supports fundraising through the Gravyty ecosystem, where campaign management may sit alongside other modules. This setup can work well for institutions that already operate within that structure, though it introduces additional coordination across systems.
Almabase is typically used by teams that want engagement and fundraising to run within the same system, with shared data across workflows.
Graduway is used in setups where institutions rely on the Gravyty ecosystem and manage engagement and fundraising through connected modules.
The choice depends on how your team prefers to operate and how closely these workflows need to stay connected during execution.
Quick tip → According to the 2024 CASE framework, alumni engagement breaks down into four measurable modes: Communication (15.4%), Experiential (6.1%), Philanthropy (4.7%), and Volunteering (1.2%). Platforms are increasingly evaluated on how well they support each of these categories.
Career networking and mentorship programs depend on how well institutions can connect alumni with students or peers in a structured way. This usually involves identifying the right participants, enabling interaction, and tracking whether those connections continue over time.
When institutions evaluate platforms for this use case, they look at how easily mentorship programs can be set up and how clearly participation can be measured.
Here’s how Almabase and PeopleGrove compare within this specific context.
PeopleGrove is designed specifically for career networking and mentorship. Institutions use it to set up matching frameworks and run structured programs where participants are guided through defined interactions. This makes it easier to manage mentorship as a focused initiative with clear boundaries.
Almabase supports mentorship within its broader alumni system. Programs run alongside existing alumni data and communication workflows, so teams can connect mentorship activity with other forms of engagement. This is useful when mentorship is one part of a larger alumni strategy rather than a standalone program.
Almabase connects mentorship activity with CRM systems, which allows teams to view participation alongside other engagement data. This helps when reporting needs to reflect overall alumni involvement instead of isolated program metrics.
PeopleGrove enhances participant profiles using LinkedIn data, which improves visibility into professional backgrounds during mentorship matching. Reporting remains centered on career program activity, which works well for teams focused on mentorship outcomes.
PeopleGrove is used primarily for career-focused engagement. Institutions adopt it when mentorship and professional networking are core priorities and require dedicated workflows.
Almabase supports mentorship within a broader engagement setup. Teams can manage events, communication, and fundraising alongside networking programs, which allows different initiatives to stay connected during execution.
PeopleGrove is typically chosen when mentorship programs are a primary focus and require a dedicated environment for managing career interactions.
Almabase is used when mentorship is one part of a broader engagement strategy that includes events, communication, and fundraising within the same system.
The choice depends on how mentorship fits into your overall alumni strategy and how closely it needs to connect with other engagement activities.
Community engagement depends on whether alumni continue to participate after joining a platform. This usually happens when institutions create spaces where interaction is visible and tied to ongoing programs rather than one-time activity.
When evaluating platforms for this use case, institutions look at how community interaction is structured and how participation connects to events or broader engagement efforts.
Here’s how Almabase and Hivebrite compare within community engagement and building.
Hivebrite is built around digital community spaces where alumni interact through groups and discussions. Institutions use it to create branded environments that encourage peer-to-peer participation. Engagement tends to grow when members see activity from others within the same community.
Almabase supports community interaction within a broader alumni system. Activity from groups or discussions connects with events and institutional initiatives, which allows teams to track how engagement moves across different programs. This helps when participation needs to translate into measurable outcomes rather than remain limited to conversations.
A 2024 study on digital alumni platforms shows that visible peer activity influences whether users stay active over time. Platforms that make participation visible across programs often see more consistent engagement.
Almabase connects event workflows directly with alumni activity. Teams can track who participates and follow up within the same system, which helps when events are used to drive ongoing engagement.
Hivebrite supports event participation within its community environment. It allows institutions to manage registrations and track attendance, but teams may rely on additional processes when they want to connect event activity with broader engagement efforts.
Almabase includes fundraising workflows that connect with alumni records and CRM systems. This allows teams to track how engagement activity contributes to giving over time.
Hivebrite provides limited fundraising functionality within the platform. Institutions often use additional tools when fundraising becomes part of their engagement strategy, which can add steps to tracking results.
Almabase is typically used when community engagement needs to connect with events and fundraising within the same system, so teams can manage participation and outcomes together.
Hivebrite is used when the focus is on building a standalone community space where interaction between members is the primary goal.
The choice depends on whether community engagement needs to connect with other institutional workflows or operate as a separate initiative.
After evaluating different platforms, institutions usually look for a setup where alumni activity stays connected across programs. This matters because teams often manage events, fundraising, and communication in parallel, and disconnected tools make it harder to track participation or follow up consistently.

Almabase is used in these situations because it keeps engagement activity within a single system. Event participation and giving activity are recorded together, so teams can see how programs influence each other without switching tools.
At Thomas Aquinas College, 25% of alumni signed up within three months of implementation. This was driven by moving from a static alumni page to an interactive platform where participation was visible in real time. Features such as leaderboards, campaign progress tracking, and peer-driven challenges encouraged alumni to engage more actively, which helped the team sustain participation across both events and fundraising initiatives.
As Kalyan, Founder and CEO of Almabase, notes, “technology makes the donor experience significantly better, making the donor feel connected to the organization, whether you're making a $100 donation or $100,000,” highlighting how systems th ko at bring engagement and giving together can strengthen participation over time.
Also read → Alumni management software buying guide for institutions and advancement teams
By now, you’ve seen how different platforms support alumni programs in practice. The key difference comes down to how workflows are structured and how easily teams can manage them together.
Almabase is used by institutions that want engagement activity, event participation, and giving data to stay connected within the same system. This makes it easier to track outcomes and coordinate work across teams.
If you’re evaluating platforms, the next step is to see how this works in practice. A demo can help you understand how your workflows would run within the system and how data flows across programs. Request a free demo to see how your workflows would run in practice.

Alumni management software is used by institutions to manage alumni relationships across programs. Teams use it to track interactions, run events, and manage giving activity within the same system, which helps reduce manual work when data needs to be shared across teams.
The most important features depend on how the institution runs its programs. Teams usually look for tools that support event execution and allow them to track participation over time. CRM connectivity also matters when reporting needs to reflect both engagement and giving activity in one place.
A CRM is typically used to store donor and contact records, while alumni platforms focus on engagement programs. Alumni management software connects these areas by allowing teams to run events and fundraising while keeping data aligned with institutional systems.
Many platforms connect with systems such as Blackbaud, Salesforce, or Ellucian. This allows engagement activity to reflect in donor records, which helps teams maintain accurate reporting without manually updating data across systems.
These platforms support event execution by allowing teams to manage registrations and track participation. Fundraising activity can then be linked to that engagement, which helps teams follow up with alumni based on their involvement.
The right choice depends on how your institution runs alumni programs. Teams should look at how well the platform supports their existing workflows and whether engagement activity connects with fundraising and reporting in a way that reduces manual effort.
Table of Contents
Subscribe
See how modern advancement teams bring alumni engagement and fundraising together.
In 2022 alone, charity golf events at U.S. courses raised an estimated $4.6 billion, with more than 141,000 events held and roughly 80% of all U.S. golf facilities hosting at least one. The average event raised about $29,500, but the ceiling is far higher: a well-structured tournament with the right sponsorship strategy can clear six figures in a single afternoon.
The best golf fundraising ideas however, look different depending on who you are. A K-12 booster club has different assets, different donors, and different cost structures than a hospital foundation courting major-gift prospects, and both look different from a community nonprofit trying to reach a new audience. Below are the ideas that actually work for each, with real examples of organizations putting them into practice.
Healthcare foundations occupy a different fundraising universe. Their donor base often skews into the wealthier and more philanthropic demographic, their cause has obvious emotional weight, and their boards often include physicians and executives who are themselves avid golfers. The events here tend to be larger, more polished, and more sponsorship-heavy.
The flagship model is an annual event hosted by the foundation at a premier course, often featuring physicians and executives as players.

PIH Health Foundation's 2025 golf tournament raised $400,000 to support hospital priorities ranging from medical technology to caregiver support. The Edward Foundation, the fundraising arm of Edward Hospital in Illinois, raised more than $460,000 at its 30th Annual Charity Golf Tournament at Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, with more than 300 golfers contributing through sponsorships, donations, raffles, and games. Since its founding in 1990, that foundation has raised over $57 million for community healthcare initiatives, and the annual golf tournament is a meaningful piece of that total.
These events succeed because they bundle three things: a beautiful course experience, peer recognition (physicians playing alongside major donors), and a clear connection to a hospital service line the donor cares about.
Tying the tournament to a specific disease, program, or population sharpens the emotional pull.

The Hanscom FCU Charitable Foundation's Alan M. Hart Memorial Charity Golf Classic raised $150,000 in a single year for Home Base, a Red Sox Foundation and Mass General Hospital program supporting veterans dealing with the invisible wounds of war. Over time, the tournament has contributed to more than $1.2 million in support for that program.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital has been the beneficiary of the FedEx St. Jude Championship for more than 50 years, with the event helping raise over $60 million for pediatric cancer and life-threatening disease research.
If your foundation supports multiple service lines, picking one cause per tournament and rotating year by year keeps the storytelling sharp.
A first-ever tournament tied to a specific capital project creates urgency that recurring events lack.
The Seneca Healthcare Foundation in California hosted its inaugural charity golf tournament at Bailey Creek Golf Course and raised more than $85,000 while building awareness for the construction of the new Lake Almanor Community Hospital.

Th event drew over 100 golfers and featured creative touches including a MASH-themed drink station and live stand-up comedy from a group called the Hole Hecklers. Pairing the tournament with a tangible "we're building this" story gives donors something concrete to point to.
For events that already have momentum, layered add-ons are where the real money is. The Edward Foundation's tournament includes a Helicopter Ball Drop in which entrants pay for the chance to have a numbered golf ball dropped from a helicopter and land closest to the flag. Ball drops are particularly effective because they sell to people who aren't golfing, including hospital staff, board members, and community supporters who want to participate without playing 18 holes.
Offering a $10,000 cash prize, a luxury car, or a luxury trip for a hole-in-one creates outsized excitement at relatively low cost. Most foundations partner with a hole-in-one insurance provider to cover the prize, paying a small premium for enormous marketing buzz. Co-sponsoring the prize with a local car dealership turns the sponsorship into a billboard for the dealer at the event.
Schools and universities have one fundraising asset most other organizations would kill for: a built-in, lifelong community of alumni, parents, and boosters who already feel emotionally invested.
The single most reliable model in higher ed is a recurring, branded scholarship tournament that runs every year on the same calendar slot. Take the three below examples:


For institutions that have had a rich history of golfing alumni or golf fundraisers in the past, it should be a no brainer. However, the only way tradition gets built is if something gets it started in the first place. So maybe this can be the year where your institution starts to grow that tradition if it already hasn’t?
If your school has lost a beloved coach, professor, or alum, a memorial tournament builds extraordinary loyalty. Freed-Hardeman University's annual tournament honors the legacy of Dr. Cliff Bennett, a 1961 alumnus and former golf coach whose endowed scholarship still supports students. These events draw deeper giving because donors aren't just buying a foursome but also honoring someone who mattered to them.
It also provides a natural storytelling opportunity that builds a strong emotional connection for your next and future golf fundraisers within this frame.
For K-12 and college club teams that don't have a country club or alumni database, one thing you can consider is to sell labor and small experiences.

Ohio University's club team brought a putting green carpet to the busy College Green area and sold $1 putts to students for a chance to win a prize.
Similarly, The Citadel's club team works local tournaments in exchange for reduced greens fees and sells mulligans for $1 each on a single hole with the course's permission. These ideas also have the added benefit of almost zero overhead and turn a team into a visible part of campus life.
Smaller, themed tournaments hosted by fraternities, sororities, or specific academic departments can sometimes surprise you and outperform their size.

The Tau Kappa Epsilon chapter runs an annual golf tournament to raise funds for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. These events benefit from tight-knit communities where attendance feels almost obligatory in the best way.
For schools especially, hole sponsorships are the unsung hero of the budget. Local businesses pay $250 to $1,000 for a sign on a tee box, and parents who own those businesses are an easy first ask. Stacked correctly, sponsorship revenue can easily exceed registration revenue.
Community nonprofits typically have smaller donor lists and tighter budgets than hospital foundations, but they also have more flexibility to experiment. The best ideas in this category lean toward inclusivity (so non-golfers can participate), creativity (so the event is shareable on social media), and modern formats that don't require a 7am tee time at a country club.
The single biggest shift in nonprofit golf fundraising over the past five years has been the move to Topgolf and similar venues. Topgolf events are accessible to people who don't actually play golf, run in 2-3 hour windows instead of full days, and feel more like a party than a tournament.
Avery's Hope, an all-volunteer nonprofit supporting families of pediatric GI patients, hosts an annual Topgolf fundraiser specifically to be more inclusive for patient families and children.

They drive revenue through bay sponsorships, a silent auction, and a raffle.
A glow golf night tournament uses glow-in-the-dark balls, LED-lit flags, and illuminated tee markers across nine holes after sunset.

The format is highly photogenic, perfect for social media promotion, and stands out in a market where most prospects have already been invited to half a dozen "traditional" golf scrambles this year. The lower hole count also means a lower entry barrier for casual players.
If your donor base skews younger or has lots of families with kids, a charity mini-golf tournament is a high-yield option. The economics are excellent: course rental is cheap compared to a country club, kids can play, and the whole event runs in an afternoon. This format works especially well for nonprofits serving children, families, or schools.
A golf ball drop doesn't actually require a tournament. Sell numbered balls for $10 to $25 each, drop them from a helicopter or crane over a target, and award prizes to the closest balls. The model is brilliantly simple: supporters who can't golf, won't golf, or live nowhere near the course can still buy a ball and watch the drop on a livestream. Many nonprofits run a ball drop as a low-effort revenue add-on to an existing event.
Indoor golf simulator venues let nonprofits run "tournaments" in November, December, January, and February when outdoor courses are closed in most of the country. Players can compete on famous courses like Pebble Beach or St. Andrews without leaving the building. Because most other nonprofits cluster their fundraising in spring and fall, a winter simulator event lands in a less competitive calendar window for donor attention.
You don't need a full tournament to run a hole-in-one challenge. Some nonprofits set up a single par-3 hole at a community event, charity festival, or even a parking lot driving range and charge $10 to $20 per shot. The prize, again, can be insured for a small premium. It's a strong choice for organizations that want some "golf" energy without the operational complexity of running 18 holes.
For nonprofits already running events, putting contests are an easy revenue layer. Charge $5 per putt at a fundraising gala, festival, or community event with a prize for the longest putt sunk. Operationally simple, instantly fun, and works at almost any venue with 30 feet of flat ground.
Across all three categories, the events that outperform tend to share a few traits.
First, sponsorship is the engine, not the entry fee. A four-person foursome at $600 brings in $600. A title sponsor at $25,000 brings in $25,000. Build a real sponsorship deck with tiered benefits before you ever open registration.
Second, the second year is more important than the first. The most lucrative golf fundraisers in this article are 10th, 20th, and 30th annual events. Therefore, you should be looking to treat year one as the foundation of an institution.
Third, make it easy for non-golfers to participate. Ball drops, raffles, silent auctions, dinner-only tickets, and hole sponsorships all let people give without swinging a club. In most successful events, more than half the revenue comes from these layered components.
Fourth, partner with insurance providers for big prizes. The buzz from a $10,000 hole-in-one prize is wildly disproportionate to the actual insurance premium. Make sure it’s always a consideration.
Finally, pick the format that matches your community. A 70-year-old hospital foundation should not be doing glow golf at midnight, and a 28-year-old founder nonprofit should not be running a stuffy country club tournament for a donor base that mostly lives on Instagram. The best fundraising idea is the one that fits the people you're actually asking.
The greens are waiting. Pick the format that fits, plan for the long game, and you'll be writing your own "raised $400,000" press release soon enough.
Golf fundraisers will likely continue to be an important part of fundraising culture, especially in the US. With their added advantage of flexibility across institutions and nonprofit organizations, they also serve as one of the more flexible options (provided a golf course is geographically practical).
All that said, we hope we’ve given you plenty of ideas for your next (or first) golf fundraiser! And if you are looking for a platform to help you host your fundraiser, engage donors, and raise funds, book a personalized demo with us and we’d love to know how we can help!

15+ Golf Fundraising Ideas for Healthcare, Educational, and Nonprofit Fundraising
If you're planning a charity golf event, we've rounded up 17 fun, creative golf fundraiser ideas bring people together and help your cause raise more.
Healthcare
A well run reunion event offers a seamless experience to your attendees. They register once, select a few events for the weekend, receive timely reminders, check in and move smoothly from one gathering to the next. From their perspective, the whole thing only takes a few seconds and minimal effort.
Behind the scenes, however, is an enormous amount of coordination happening across teams and timelines.
For smaller gatherings, lightweight event tools may still work perfectly well. But once reunions become larger, multi-event set ups, or tied to broader advancement goals, managing registrations or ticketing is just one cog in the wheel. That’s when many alumni and advancement teams eventually move toward platforms designed specifically for reunion and alumni engagement workflows. In this blog, we’ll break down the platforms best suited for different types of reunion events, team structures, and engagement goals.
Many teams begin with the tools already available internally, like spreadsheets for guest tracking, email platforms for outreach, online forms for RSVPs, and a ticketing platform layered on top to handle payments. And that set up works well for a while too.
Most event platforms are designed to handle transactions: collect registrations, process payments, send confirmation emails. While this works just fine for one-off events, reunions call for something more.
Most advancement and alumni teams are already familiar with the friction points:
Individually, none of these problems are unusual. But together, a combination of any of these issues creates significant overhead. This holds especially true for leaner teams, when the issue becomes even more visible after the event ends. They might find themselves having to spend days cleaning spreadsheets, confirming attendance records, updating CRM systems, and piecing together engagement data that should have been captured automatically.
Reunions are complex and involve long-term alumni relationships, donor engagement, segmented outreach, multi-day programming, and post-event reporting that extends well beyond the weekend itself. They require platforms that will understand the context behind why all this needs to be connected.
For example, knowing that 400 people registered for a reunion is useful. But knowing which classes had the strongest turnout, which former volunteers re-engaged, or which lapsed donors attended for the first time in years is significantly more valuable.
The same applies operationally. Generic platforms often require teams to manage communications, reporting, and CRM updates separately, creating duplicate work across systems that don’t naturally connect to one another.
That’s why many institutions eventually move toward platforms designed specifically for alumni engagement and reunion management. It makes a huge difference to reduce manual coordination, improve data continuity, and make reunions easier to manage as part of a larger alumni strategy.
Milestone reunions sit at the intersection of emotional significance and operational intensity. These are your 10th, 25th, 50th year reunions.
You need class-year segmentation for targeted invitations, multi-day session management, integrated giving pages and CRM sync so reunion attendance feeds your donor records. Here are our recommendations:

Almabase is particularly well suited for milestone reunions because it brings event management and alumni fundraising into one place. Alumni can sign up for multiple reunion activities, contribute to a class gift campaign, and receive communication tailored to their class year, all within the same experience. On the admin side, QR code check-ins and automatic CRM syncing make it easier to track both attendance and giving, which is especially useful when reunion engagement feeds into long-term donor stewardship efforts. Custom pricing offered.

Eventbrite is a practical option for smaller institutions or volunteer-led reunion committees where the goal is mainly registration and payment collection rather than advancement integration. The platform is for free events; and fees apply for paid ticketing, which can be borne by the organizers or passed on to attendees.

Slate is a unified, enterprise-grade CRM tool built exclusively for educational institutions that manages the entire student-to-alumnus lifecycle within a single database. For institutions already using Slate, reunion data flows natively into existing student-to-alumni records with absolutely no external CRM sync needed. The platform offers heavy-duty fundraising support with dedicated giving portals, customized gift processing, and major gift pipeline management. It’s a great fit for institutions that want a complete ecosystem to bridge admissions, student engagement, and advanced donor stewardship. Base licensing starts at $30,000/year.
Multi-day reunions are a little tricky to coordinate, because they demand seamless coordination across fragmented schedules, multiple venues, and diverse participant needs. Your platform should be able to handle sub-events, inventory management for ticketed activities, provide attendees with scheduling tools so they can build their own agenda, and give organizers visibility into logistics in real time.
Almabase brings event management and multi-day scheduling into one place. This means attendees can sign-up for personalized itineraries across sessions, receive real-time updates about capacity and changes, and organizers track attendance by session and segment. Capacity management, dietary tracking, and tiered pricing (full weekend vs. individual days) are straightforward to configure. Another great feature is the CRM sync which captures which alumni attended which sessions, giving organisers a comprehensive picture of attendance.

Cvent is purpose-built for multi-venue, multi-day events with precision logistics. Its session management capabilities include capacity limits, waitlists, and real-time room changes. Attendees can even use a mobile app to build schedules; while organizers see live dashboards by session and venue. It also offers venue integration, dietary management, badge printing, and check-in workflows, which are all native to the platform. The pricing for Cvent is based on event size and features.
These are the more happening, lively events: Homecoming weekends, sports alumni reunions, performing arts gatherings, and these are usually built around movement and participation rather than a single formal gathering.
Almabase is a strong fit for institutions running reunion weekends with multiple parallel events and alumni segments. You can create separate registration flows, send targeted communication to different affinity groups, track attendance across activities, and connect participation back to alumni engagement records. It works especially well when the reunion weekend also includes fundraising or volunteer engagement initiatives. Almabase offers custom pricing.

Swoogo is best suited for highly programmed reunion weekends with complex schedules and session tracks. Teams can use the platform to build personalized agendas, move between activities, and manage multi-day itineraries through one system. Their pricing starts around $11,800 a year for a single-user license.

Whova is a useful option for highly social reunions where interaction between attendees is part of the experience itself. Features like attendee networking, live messaging, digital photo galleries, and mobile directories make it well suited for homecoming-style events. Custom pricing is offered based on requirements.
Many reunions are designed to bring entire alumni communities together, including spouses, children, volunteers, and local alumni chapters. These events usually require flexible registrations, family-friendly ticketing, and simple communication workflows.

WildApricot is a natural fit for community-oriented reunions because it combines event management with membership and volunteer coordination. Family registrations, recurring events, and simple payment collection make it particularly useful for alumni associations and smaller institutions trying to manage ongoing community engagement beyond a single reunion weekend. Pricing starts around $60/month.

Glue Up works well for alumni associations with active local chapters and recurring community events. The platform focuses heavily on member engagement and ongoing relationship management over one-off events. Custom pricing is offered for enterprise level subscriptions, while the ‘Plus’ tier is priced at $4500 a year.

Using Mailchimp and Google Forms together is a practical setup for smaller reunion teams with limited budgets. This combination makes for a nifty set up when the reunion is simple enough that teams mainly need RSVP collection, reminder emails, and attendee exports. Mailchimp is free for up to 250 contacts; paid plans start at $13/month and scale based on your chosen features.
Reunions under the five-year milestone and professional networking events for recent graduates have a different priority: career connection and networking over nostalgia. Attendees want a professional directory, session selection (panels, workshops, speaker talks), and a way to connect with people in their industry after the event.

Graduway is designed specifically for career-focused alumni engagement. Its tools are geared toward helping alumni build meaningful professional connections through mentorship programs, networking communities, alumni directories, and ongoing career engagement initiatives. The platform offers custom enterprise pricing.
Almabase is particularly useful when institutions want professional reunions to feed into broader alumni engagement and advancement efforts. Teams can segment alumni by industry or graduation year, manage multiple networking sessions, track attendee engagement, and continue communication after the event through the same platform. Custom pricing.

Built for institutional database workflows, Encompass (formerly iModules) is a great fit for professional reunions with multiple panels, workshops, or speaker tracks. Attendees can register for individual sessions, while its built-in capacity controls help manage high-demand events more smoothly. It also automatically logs attendance and engagement data back into advancement records. Pricing for the platform depends on the broader institutional enterprise license.
Not every alumnus can fly back to campus. You need virtual and/or hybrid attendance registration separate from in-person, live streaming or integration with a streaming tool, the ability to capture virtual check-ins for your CRM, and post-event recordings so remote alumni can watch sessions they missed.

Hopin is best suited for large hybrid reunion experiences with multiple simultaneous sessions and networking layers. Features like virtual expo halls, breakout spaces, and structured networking make it work more like a digital conference than a webinar being held with minimal interaction. Pricing starts at $99/month per organizer.

Airmeet is a good option if you have an interaction-heavy virtual reunion in mind. Social lounges and networking tables create smaller conversational spaces, which helps remote attendees participate more actively instead of simply watching a stream. Entry tiers start around $167/month.
As reunions have evolved over the years, so too have the platforms that they are hosted on. However, there are always new as well as persistent issues for which you will want the right features to fit your needs. Here are a few features worth looking into:
Especially when the reunion is a large one, registrations, check-ins, and RSVP management is often a big headache both for staff and attendees if not done well. When platforms aren’t built for that complexity, your staff end up having to compensate with manual work: tracking waitlists in spreadsheets, reconciling duplicate records before CRM uploads, or maintaining separate documents just to manage attendee data accurately.
A strong reunion platform keeps all of your ticketing, payments, and gifts connected in a single system, handling pricing, refunds, add-ons, as well as reporting together so staff aren’t left reconciling records after the event ends.
Reunion communication begins long before the event itself. A reunion platform should be able to keep communication connected to registration data, allowing updates and messaging to adjust automatically based on schedules, roles, and attendee preferences.
Mobile check-in reduces friction by allowing volunteers to scan QR codes, process attendees quickly, and log attendance automatically in real time.
A reunion platform becomes even more relevant for large, multi-day reunions because it keeps attendance connected directly to attendee records from the start, making it easier to understand who attended, which sessions saw engagement, and where follow-up should happen next.
Reunions offer institutions a rare opportunity to understand alumni behavior in real time. A strong reunion platform integrates cleanly with systems like Raiser's Edge NXT, Salesforce, or HubSpot so reunion engagement becomes part of the institution’s larger alumni record instead of remaining isolated event data.
Don’t start by comparing feature lists side by side. The decision usually becomes clearer once the event objectives and operational constraints are visible. Think about what the reunion is trying to achieve, who is running it, and how much of the work needs to connect back into long-term alumni data.
In practice, the “right” platform is the one that reduces the most friction in your specific setup, rather than the one with the most capabilities on paper.
Reunions that are focused on increasing attendance depend heavily on segmentation and communication. Getting the right message to the right cohort at the right time has more impact than any individual feature in the registration flow.
For teams focused on reducing administrative load, the issue is not necessarily the event itself, but the amount of manual reconciliation required afterward. If reunion data doesn’t flow back into the CRM, the operational work doesn’t disappear but moves to a later stage in the process.
Allow your team size and structure to shape platform choice! Smaller alumni teams need systems that can be set up quickly and managed without dedicated technical support. In those environments, simplicity and speed matter more than deep configuration options, because the same person managing the reunion is often also handling communications, donor outreach, and reporting.
Larger advancement teams operate under a different set of constraints. They have larger targets tied to advancement goals which require deeper CRM integration, more structured data flows, and systems that can support multiple stakeholders working in parallel.
Data requirements are one of the main deciding factors. Some institutions need full CRM synchronization, where registrations, attendance, and gift activity flow automatically into systems like Raiser's Edge NXT.
Other teams operate with simpler needs: clean registration exports, basic attendance tracking, and manual uploads into existing systems. In those cases, lighter platforms can be perfectly sufficient without introducing unnecessary complexity.
Confusing registration flows, unclear session structures, or poorly timed communication show up quickly in abandonment rates. In case alumni have not interacted with institutional systems in years, clarity and simplicity in the registration process will go a long way.
The same applies at check-in: a smooth entry experience sets a very different tone compared to visible queues or manual lookups at the door.
What happens afterward is just as likely to determine whether the event contributes to long-term engagement or remains an isolated activity in the calendar. Attendance data, donor participation, volunteer sign-ups, and communication history all become more valuable when they can be carried forward into future outreach.
In practice, the most useful systems make post-event work feel like a continuation of the same workflow. When reunion data feeds cleanly into CRM records and follow-up communications, each event builds on the last.
Yes, particularly for institutions on Raiser's Edge NXT. Almabase covers registration, ticketing, segmented email, mobile check-in, peer-to-peer fundraising, and CRM sync in one system. The bi-directional RE NXT integration means reunion attendance flows into constituent records automatically. Request a demo to see how the event and CRM workflows connect.
They can handle basic ticketing. They can't segment alumni by class year, sync attendance to an advancement CRM, or connect the event to a giving campaign. For a small, informal reunion without advancement goals, a generic platform works. Once class-year data, giving campaigns, or donor stewardship are involved, purpose-built tools are worth it.
Mostly in how success gets measured. Institutional reunions typically include a fundraising component tracked against engagement and giving metrics in a CRM. Nonprofit reunions center on volunteer engagement and cause-based giving. The platform features that matter shift accordingly.
Not for simple events. A Google Form and Venmo can get 40 people to a dinner. The complexity scales when you're managing class-year segmentation, multi-day scheduling, tiered pricing, CRM data requirements, and post-event reporting. At that scale, doing it manually costs more in staff hours than the platform does.
Choosing the right reunion platform comes down to the goals of the event and the challenges your team is trying to solve.
For smaller reunions with simple registration and communication needs, lightweight tools like WildApricot or Eventbrite are quite enough. They work well for straightforward ticketing, RSVPs, community events, and recurring alumni gatherings without adding unnecessary complexity.
As reunions become more activity-driven or networking-focused, platforms like Almabase, Whova, and Graduway offer stronger support for multi-day programming, attendee engagement, and professional networking experiences.
For advancement teams running milestone reunions with a fundraising component, Almabase is one of the strongest options because registration, communication, check-ins, reunion giving, segmentation, and CRM sync all work together in one system. Instead of becoming isolated event data, reunion participation becomes part of the long-term alumni engagement record.
If you want to see how Almabase can power your next reunion, feel free to request a personalized demo, or if you want a self-guided look, head over to our product tour!

Top Platforms for A Successful Reunion Event
Find the right platform to host your reunion events whether it's a multi-day, professional, activity-based, or milestone reunion. Find your best fit.
Events
The annual giving campaign was once the primary window for alumni fundraising. Institutions could send a few emails with a year-end giving appeal, and still see support from alumni who felt a strong sense of loyalty to the institution.
That approach is harder to rely on today, as alumni are now asked to support many causes outside their alma mater. If the institution reaches out only during fundraising season, the appeal can feel disconnected.
Despite this, the opportunity to grow alumni donations remains strong. CASE’s latest findings show that giving to U.S. colleges and universities reached $78.8 billion in FY2025, up 4% from the previous year.
In this blog, we’ll cover how to keep alumni engaged before the ask and plan campaigns that make giving timely, relevant, and easier to repeat.
Alumni donations today depend on the relationship alumni have with the institution before a campaign goes live. Loyalty still matters, but it carries more weight when alumni hear from the institution regularly and understand why their support is needed.
Here are the shifts shaping alumni giving today:

Increasing alumni donations starts with making the ask feel earned. Alumni are more likely to participate when the institution has stayed relevant before the campaign begins.
The sections below focus on the parts institutions can improve directly.
A donation request works better when alumni already feel involved with the institution. Regular communication helps maintain that connection.
For example, a useful alumni newsletter can keep alumni connected between campaigns. It can share student stories, highlight meaningful campus updates, and point alumni toward ways to participate.
Institutions can strengthen alumni engagement by:
Teams that need more practical alumni engagement ideas can start with programs that give alumni a reason to participate before the donation ask. The goal is to make giving feel like a continuation of the relationship.
A strong campaign can still lose participation if the giving page is difficult to use. This is especially important on mobile. Many alumni will arrive from an email, text message, social post, or event reminder. If the page is slow or the form asks for too much information, the donor may leave before completing the gift.
A better giving experience should make the next step obvious:
The point is to remove friction. Once alumni have decided to give, the donation flow should not make them rethink the decision.
Alumni campaigns work better when people can see activity around them. A time-bound campaign gives alumni a reason to act soon. An event gives the ask a natural moment. Peer outreach can make the invitation feel more personal because it comes from someone alumni recognize.
Cornell University’s 2026 Giving Day shows how peer activity can strengthen a short campaign window. In 24 hours, the campaign brought together 17,011 donors and raised $11.3 million. Cornell also had 704 Giving Day champions. Their personal outreach helped bring in more than 4,037 gifts.

To build momentum, every campaign element should give alumni a reason to act:
First-time donors help institutions grow alumni participation beyond the same group of regular contributors. A first gift may be modest, but it gives the institution a real starting point for a longer donor relationship.
Institutions can encourage first-time alumni donors by:
Campaign framing also matters here. If the message only emphasizes dollars raised, smaller donors may feel their gift will not make a difference. A better approach is to frame the campaign around participation as well as revenue.
For example, instead of only saying “Help us raise $100,000,” the campaign can also say “Help us bring 500 alumni donors together for student scholarships.”
Matching gifts can make the impact of a donation easier to understand. When alumni know their gift can go further within a specific window, they have a stronger reason to act. Giving challenges work in a similar way by giving alumni a clear goal to rally around.
Good challenge structures include:
The challenge should be simple enough for alumni to understand quickly. They should know what the goal is, what their gift helps unlock, and why taking part now makes a difference.
Recurring giving helps institutions build steadier alumni support after a campaign ends. It gives donors a simple way to continue contributing without waiting for the next appeal.
Recurring giving works best when donors understand why it matters:
That message should continue after sign-up. Regular updates, thank-you notes, and impact stories help recurring donors see that their support is still active and appreciated. This gives them more reason to keep giving over time.
Alumni are more likely to give when the outcome is clear. Institutions should show how donations are used in practical terms. The more specific the connection, the easier it is for alumni to understand the value of giving.
Impact communication should help donors see what happened because they gave:
Follow-up matters just as much as the appeal. After the campaign ends, alumni should hear what happened. Share the result, thank donors clearly, and explain what comes next. This closes the loop and gives alumni a stronger reason to participate again.
Data helps institutions see how alumni are responding to a campaign. It can show where interest is building, where follow-up is needed, and which parts of the campaign are helping alumni take action.
The most useful signals often come from activity the institution already tracks. Event attendance can show which alumni are already involved. Email engagement can show which messages are getting attention. Giving history can help teams separate new donors from lapsed or repeat donors.
Digital tools make these signals easier to use. Institutions can:
Platforms like Almabase help institutions streamline alumni donations and improve visibility into donor engagement. They bring the work around alumni giving into one connected system. Teams can see engagement, event activity, and online giving in one place, which makes follow-up easier to manage.
For example, Archbishop Riordan High School used Almabase to improve its giving day experience. The team could customize campaigns with less dependence on IT and see gift activity in real time. The school reported a 550% increase in giving day donations, from $60,646 to $338,724.

A good alumni donation campaign starts before the first appeal goes out. The team needs to know what the campaign is trying to achieve. It should also be clear which alumni groups matter most and why the timing feels relevant.
Start with the result the campaign needs to achieve. A financial target sets a revenue goal, while a donor target indicates whether the campaign is increasing alumni participation.
Past campaign data can help keep both targets realistic. If one class year, department, or program performed well earlier, that group can receive a focused goal rather than being treated like the entire alumni base.
Setting clear fundraising goals helps the team decide what to measure before the campaign begins and what to improve after it ends.
A useful goal plan should answer five questions:
Segmentation helps institutions avoid sending the same appeal to every alum. The message should reflect what each group already knows, values, or has done with the institution. The question is simple: what does this group already care about, and what would make this campaign feel relevant to them?
Institutions can group alumni by relationship stage and recent activity:
The campaign format should make the goal easier to act on. A participation-focused campaign needs urgency. It also needs visible progress so alumni can see others getting involved. But if alumni attention is already close to an event, the giving ask should connect naturally to that moment.
Here are a few ways to choose the right format:
Promotion should build attention before the ask becomes urgent. Alumni may not give after the first message, so the campaign needs a steady rhythm across the full timeline.
Email can carry the main story. SMS can support short reminders. Social posts can show progress, and peer outreach can make the ask feel more personal.
A simple campaign timeline can include:
Stronger alumni donations come from the work institutions do before the appeal goes out. Regular engagement keeps alumni connected before the appeal. Clear campaign goals give the ask a reason to exist. A smooth giving experience helps donors complete the gift.
Each campaign should also improve the next one. Teams can look at which alumni responded, which messages worked, and where follow-up was needed. That insight helps institutions make future campaigns more relevant instead of repeating the same appeal with a new deadline.
Over time, this builds a healthier alumni giving program. First-time donors have a clearer path into participation. Repeat donors see why continued support matters. Recurring donors stay connected to the impact their gifts make possible.
Almabase helps institutions bring alumni engagement, fundraising campaigns, and events into one connected place. For teams trying to grow alumni donations without adding more manual work, that connected view makes it easier to focus on participation and results.
Book a demo today to see how Almabase can support your alumni giving strategy.

The best way to increase alumni donations is to keep alumni engaged before the campaign begins. A donation request is easier to act on when alumni already understand the institution’s priorities and feel connected to its community.
Start with regular communication that gives alumni a reason to stay involved. The message should not always be about giving. It can share student stories that show impact. It can also invite alumni into events, mentoring, or other ways to stay involved before the next campaign.
Effective alumni donation strategies give alumni a clear reason to participate. A giving day works well when the campaign needs urgency. A matching gift can help donors see how their contribution goes further. Recurring giving gives alumni a way to continue their support after the campaign ends.
Giving days work because they focus attention within a short time frame. Alumni can see the campaign’s progress as it unfolds, which makes participation feel more active and easier to join.
First-time donors are more likely to give when the ask feels approachable. A smaller suggested gift can help, especially when it is tied to a clear outcome such as student support or scholarships.
Institutions can improve participation by staying connected with alumni between campaigns. When the appeal arrives, the purpose should be clear, and the donation process should be easy to complete.

How To Increase Alumni Donations And Grow Participation
See how institutions can increase alumni donations by keeping alumni engaged, planning stronger campaigns, and making the giving experience easier.
Fundraising